|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
|
|
| |
THE ‘X’ FACTOR
But the king replied to Araunah, "No, I insist on paying you for it.
I will not sacrifice to the LORD my God burnt offerings that cost me nothing. "
So David bought the threshing floor and the oxen and paid fifty shekels of silver for
them. II Sam 24:24
Ever wondered that there is a possibility of we ‘sacrificing’ to the Lord without
ever ‘sacrificing’ anything… of working ‘sacrificially' for Him, without even spending
a dime! In these days of crass commercialism, a day may arrive when ‘sacrifices’ of the VIPs’
performed in the full glare of the media may secretly be ‘sponsored’ by someone
to curry favour of the former.
Well, David was in that position, when a loyal subject of his, wanted to ‘sponsor’ his
sacrifice to God. Before we get into the nitty-gritty of this insightful Biblical account,
I surmise that it would be worthwhile to ‘paint’ its background.
Beginning verses of II Sam 24 present a grim picture of what happens,
when even ‘a man of God’s own heart’ giving in to satanic temptations starts trusting mere
flesh more than the omnipotent One for scoring military victories. There we see David the very
one who is credited with making a sublime observation ‘No king is saved by the size of his army;
no warrior escapes by his great strength. A horse is a vain hope for deliverance; despite all its
great strength it cannot save. ’
(Ps 33:16-17) temporarily losing his spiritual bearings and going for
a census, all with the intention of ‘glorying in his military might’.
God, though He cannot tempt any man
(James 1:13), is frequently described in Scripture as doing what
He merely permits to be done; and so, in this case, He permitted Satan to tempt David. Satan was the
active mover, while God only withdrew His supporting grace, and the great tempter prevailed against the king
(See Exodus 7:13;
1 Sam 26:19). The order was given to Joab, who, though not generally restrained by religious
scruples, did not fail to present, in strong terms
(1 Chro 21:3), the sin and danger of this measure. He used
every argument to dissuade the king from his purpose. The sacred history has not mentioned the objections,
which he and other distinguished officers urged against it in the council of David. But it expressly states
that they were all overruled by the inflexible resolution of the king.
The act of numbering the people was not in itself sinful; for Moses did it by the express authority of
God (Numbers 1:2). But David acted not only independently of such order or sanction, but from motives
unworthy of the delegated king of Israel; from pride and vainglory; from self-confidence and distrust of God;
and, above all, from ambitious designs of conquest, in furtherance of which he was determined to force
the people into military service, and to ascertain whether he could muster an army sufficient for the
magnitude of the enterprises he contemplated. It was a breach of the constitution, an infringement of
the liberties of the people, and opposed to that divine policy which required that Israel should continue
a separate people. His eyes were not opened to the heinousness of his sin till God had spoken unto him by
His commissioned prophet.
His overwhelming sense of his sin led him to accept the punishment denounced, notwithstanding its apparent
excess of severity. He proceeded on a good principle in choosing the pestilence out of the choices
(of punishment) offered. Here again, we see the fair nature of “a man of God’s own heart” coming to the fore.
In pestilence he was equally exposed, as it was just and right he should be, to danger as his people, whereas,
in war and famine, he possessed means of protection superior to them. Besides, he thereby showed his trust,
founded on long experience, in the divine goodness.
Divine goodness, it was, which limited the chastisement as we see it recorded in
I Sam 24:16-18 with the
Divine instruction to "Go up and build an altar to the LORD on the threshing floor of Araunah the Jebusite"
to end the raging plague.
He went in procession with his leading men from the royal palace, down Mount Zion, and through the intervening
city. Although he had plenty of space on his own property, he was commanded, under premptory
direction, to go a considerable distance from his home, up Mount Moriah, to erect an altar on
premises, which he had to buy. It was on or close to the spot where Abraham had offered up Isaac.
Having ascertained the motive of the royal visit, Aranuah did what most of us, would have done in his
place…offered all that David required for the expiatory sacrifice free of cost. Without dabbling on
the merits or demerits of such an offer, it is noteworthy to focus on David’s response, which is laudable
and worthy of being engraved in stone with a purpose of being shown to many a professing God’s servant who
would not want to expend a farthing in doing his Master’s work but rather would invariably look for a
sponsor for his globetrotting, supposed world-changing missions!
While, it is not wrong for any God’s servant to look for financial assistance in accomplishing his Master’s work,
there is no bar on he first expending his own resources to the maximum, before looking out
for sponsors! THIS IS THE “X-FACTOR” IN GOD’S WORK, WHICH PLEASES HIM THE MOST! George Muller
that great orphanage director of yore, despite ever present pressing financial needs in his noble
work never went out soliciting funds but instead expended many of his savings readily to keep the
great work going besides always trusting the Lord to ‘move the hearts of men’ to come to his aid.
Not for him and many of his ilk in Christendom’s history, any sugarcoated, well-disguised pleadings
on TV or elsewhere for money to manage God-ordained work!
In this context, it is worthwhile for us to remember, a day would come when the works of many a great,
self-proclaimed World changer would be put through fire
(I Cor 3:12-15). God forbid, if it gets
burnt up like hay, wood or straw, we would know where the problem lay. On the contrary, on that
great Day of Judgment (it would be a day of ‘great surprises’ also), where the believers would be
judged first (I Peter 4:17) the works of the ‘last & least lot’
(Matt 19:30) may come out of the
fire shining like well-panned Gold in all its luster!
It is always worthwhile for any God’s servant or even a Christian engaged in a secular
profession to introspect his motives while setting out to do “God’s work”, for in the Master’s
eyes “means to the end are as important as the end itself”. I say this with all the love and care,
I can muster for my co-servants in God’s vineyard because having been ‘called’ to the most fulfilling
of all vocations, it ought to be their goal, not to settle for anything less than
the ‘very best’…in the great coming day of rewards!
Yours in His service,
(Suresh Manoharan)
|
|
|
|
|
